J Clin Gynecol Obstet
Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 1, Number 4-5, October 2012, pages 57-62


Length of the Umbilical Cord and Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Singleton Pregnancies Delivered at Greater Than or Equal to 34 Weeks’ Gestation

Shunji Suzukia, b, Yukiko Fusea

aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
bCorresponding author: Shunji Suzuki, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, 5-11-12 Tateishi, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 124-0012, Japan

Manuscript accepted for publication October 3, 2012
Short title: Length of the Cord and Perinatal Outcomes
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jcgo62w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: We examined the relation between the length of the umbilical cord and perinatal outcomes in Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation.

Method: The material reviewed consisted of the total population of Japanese women who gave birth to singleton babies at 34 - 41 weeks’ gestation at Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital between 2002 and 2009.

Results: The average of the length of the umbilical cord was 56.2 ± 11.7 cm (range: 19 - 133 cm). Long and short umbilical cords were defined as those umbilical cords measuring approximately + 1.5 SD above and -1.5 SD below the mean, which are ≥ 74 and ≤ 38 cm in length (5.0 and 0.9 %). Normal umbilical cords were defined as those umbilical cords measuring within ± 1.0 SD of the mean, which is 45 - 68 cm in length. Using logistic multivariable regression analysis, short umbilical cords were associated with the increased rate of emergent Cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.3 - 3.7, P < 0.01) while the long umbilical cords were associated with the increased rate of multiple nuchal cords and true umbilical knots (multiple nuchal cords: adjusted OR 9.16, 95% CI 7.4 - 11, P < 0.01; true umbilical knots: adjusted OR 8.95, 95% CI 5.1 - 16, P < 0.01). However they were not associated significantly with the adverse perinatal outcomes.

Conclusion: The short or long umbilical cords may not be associated with the adverse perinatal outcomes in Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation.

Keywords: Short umbilical cords; Long umbilical cords; Perinatal outcome; Japanese pregnancy

Introduction▴Top 

Most umbilical cords have been reported to be 50 - 60 cm, and very few have been observed to be abnormally short or long [1, 2]. To date, some authors have agreed that excessively short and long umbilical cords have been suggested to correlate with a variety of fetal problems such as intrapartum distress and/or demise [1-6], while some authors have denied any relation to fetal distress and poor fetal outcome from problems of umbilical cord length in their literatures [7-9]. In this study, we examined the relation between the length of the umbilical cord and perinatal outcomes in Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation.

Methods▴Top 

The protocol for this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital. Informed consent concerning analysis from a retrospective database was obtained from all subjects.

The material reviewed consisted of the total population of Japanese women who gave birth to singleton babies at 34 - 41 weeks’ gestation at Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital between 2002 and 2009. All umbilical cords and placentae were screened identically by trained staff.

During this period, there were 11,029 Japanese women who gave birth to singleton babies at 34 - 41 weeks’ gestation. Table 1 shoes the clinical characteristics and findings of placentae of the patients. The average of the length of the umbilical cord was 56.2 ± 11.7 cm (range: 19 - 133 cm). In this study, long umbilical cords were defined as those umbilical cords measuring approximately +1.5 SD above the mean, which is ≥ 74 cm in length (n = 548, 5.0%), while short umbilical cords were defined as those umbilical cords measuring approximately -1.5 SD below the mean, which is ≤ 38 cm in length (n = 96, 0.9%). In this study, normal umbilical cords were defined as those umbilical cords measuring within ± 1.0 SD of the mean, which is 45 - 68 cm in length (n = 9,809).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and Findings of Placentae of the Japanese Women who Gave Birth to Singleton Babies at 34 - 41 weeks’ Gestation
 

The diagnosis of circumvallate placenta, succenturiate lobes of placenta, velamentous cord insertion and single umbilical artery were made macroscopically and confirmed by placental pathology. The gestational age of the pregnancies were established by ultrasonographic examination of the fetal crown-rump length at 8 - 11 weeks’ gestation.

Light for gestational age and heavy for gestational age infants were defined as those with sex- and aged-adjusted birth weights below and over the tenth percentile according to the fetal growth curve for Japanese (Acta Neonatol Jpn from Japan Society of Neonatology, 1998). Oligohydramnios was defined as an amniotic fluid index value < 5, while polyhydramnios was defined as an amniotic fluid index value > 24 on ultrasonographic examination during pregnancy. Non-reassuring fetal status was diagnosed using fetal cardiotocogram based on ACOG Committee Opinion (2004). Apgar scores < 7 were considered low. Placental abruption was defined as complete or partial separation of a normally implanted placenta occurring before delivery, confirmed at delivery by evidence of retro-placental bleeding at delivery and placental pathology. Hypertensive disorders were defined as blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg measured on two or more occasions at least 6 hours apart with the patient under bed rest. A 75 g 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test was performed to diagnose gestational diabetes according to the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1995). During this period, gestational diabetes was defined as following three criteria: a plasma glucose level that met two of the ≥ 100 mg/dL while fasting, ≥ 180 mg/dL at 1 hour, or ≥ 150 mg/dL at 2 hours.

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number (%). For statistical analysis, the Χ2 test for categorical variables and the Student’s t-test for continuous variables were used. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered significant. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated. Variables used in the multivariate model were those that on univariate analysis had shown statistically significance (P < 0.05) toward association with clinical significance in pregnancies with short and long umbilical cords. Logistic regression was then performed to identify the independent factors associated with the length in a multivariate model.

Results▴Top 

Table 2 shows the clinical characteristics of the Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at 34 - 41 weeks’ gestation with normal, short and long umbilical cords. There were no measurable differences in maternal age, parity or maternal complications such as hypertensive disorders or gestational diabetes among the 3 groups.

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of the Japanese Singleton Pregnancies Delivered at 34 - 41 Weeks’ Gestation With Normal, Short and Long Umbilical Cords
 

In the both pregnancies with short and long umbilical cords, the rate of pregnancies conceived in vitro fertilization was significantly higher than that with normal umbilical cords (short umbilical cords: crude OR 16.0, 95% CI 7.7 - 33, P < 0.01; long umbilical cords: crude OR 5.56, 95% CI 3.3 - 9.4, P < 0.01).

Table 3 shows the perinatal outcomes in the Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at 34 - 41 weeks’ gestation with normal, short and long umbilical cords.

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Perinatal Outcomes of the Japanese Singleton Pregnancies Delivered at 34 - 41 Weeks’ Gestation With Normal, Short and Long Umbilical Cords
 

In the pregnancies with short umbilical cords, the rate of emergent Cesarean delivery was significantly higher (crude OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.2 - 3.2, P < 0.01) and the rate of heavy-for-gestational-age infant was significantly lower (crude OR 0.00, P = 0.02) than those with normal umbilical cords. The average neonatal birth weight and placental weight in the pregnancies with short umbilical cords were significantly lighter than those with normal umbilical cords. Using logistic multivariable regression analysis, short umbilical cords were associated with the increased rate of emergent Cesarean delivery (adjusted OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.3 - 3.7, P < 0.01) although they did not show an independent relation with the rate of heavy-for-gestational-age infant (P = 0.06).

In the pregnancies with long umbilical cords, the incidence of pregnancies with succenturiate lobes of placenta, multiple nuchal cords and true umbilical knots were significantly higher than those with normal umbilical cords (succenturiate lobes of placenta: crude OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.2 - 4.9, P = 0.01; multiple nuchal cords: crude OR 12.3, 95% CI 9.9 - 15, P < 0.01; true umbilical knots: crude OR 12.6, 95% CI 7.2 - 22, P < 0.01). Although the rate of emergent Cesarean delivery was lower in the pregnancies with long umbilical cords than that with normal umbilical cord (crude OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.80, P < 0.01), the rate of vacuum/forcepsdeliveries was higher (crude OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.1 - 1.9, P = 0.02). The average neonatal birth weight and placental weight in the pregnancies with long umbilical cords were significantly heavier than those with normal umbilical cords. In the pregnancies with long umbilical cords, in addition, the rate of low Apgar score at 1 minute and postpartum hemorrhage ≥ 1,000 mL were significantly higher than those with normal umbilical cords (low Apgar score at 1 minute: crude OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.0 - 3.1, P = 0.04; postpartum hemorrhage ≥ 1,000 mL: crude OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.2 - 2.4, P < 0.01).

Using logistic multivariable regression analysis, the long umbilical cords were associated with the increased rate of multiple nuchal cords and true umbilical knots; however they were not associated significantly with the adverse perinatal outcomes as shown in Table 4.

Table 4.
Click to view
Table 4. Adjusted Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals in Cases With Long Umbilical Cords Using Logistic Multivariable Regression Analysis
 
Discussion▴Top 

The major findings of this study were as follows: (1) the occurrence of abnormal length of the umbilical cords seemed to be increased in the pregnancies conceived in vitro fertilization; (2) the short umbilical cords seemed to contribute to the increased rate of emergent Cesarean delivery; however they may not be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes; and (3) the long umbilical cords seemed to be associated with the increased rate of multiple nuchal cords and true knots; however they may not contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes.

This may be the first report indicating the relation between the length of the umbilical cords and the history of in vitro fertilization use. However, mechanisms leading to this consequence are not clear. A relationship between the placental morphologic features and the superficial implantation and/or inadequate orientation of the blastocyst after in vitro fertilization and intrauterine embryo transfer has been proposed [10]. In addition, an abnormal insertion of the cord is of major clinical importance because of its association with vasa praevia and fetal haemorrhage has been thought to be caused by disturbed orientation of the blastocyst at implantation which is probably related to the in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer procedure [11]. In this study, we could not find these placental abnormalities in the pregnancies with short or long umbilical cords; however the characteristic implantation and/or orientation of embryo conceived in vitro fertilization may contribute to the abnormal length of the umbilical cords.

In this study, although the short umbilical cords seemed to contribute to the increased rate of emergent Cesarean delivery, they may not be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Logically the unentangled cord length must reach from the placental insertion to the vaginal outlet if the infant is to be delivered without complications [1-3]. Situations in which less cord remains in the uterine cavity may have the potential to prevent the fetal descending during labor, which may also contribute to the increased rate of emergent Cesarean section without fetal asphyxia. These results seem to support a previous study by Berg and Rayburn [7] that an abnormally short umbilical cord at birth beyond 34 weeks is not by itself associated with an increased risk of acid-base imbalance at delivery; however they may contrary to some previous reports concerning the increased risk of mothers and fetuses with short umbilical cords [1-6]. One reason for the differences may be a small sample size in this study. In our study, there were only 96 pregnancies complicated by short umbilical cord. The other reason may be the study with the singleton pregnant women who delivered at ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation. We think that almost serious cases such as severe fetal growth restriction and/or congenital anomalies in our institute have been intervened before 34 weeks’ gestation.

In this study, the long umbilical cords seemed to be associated with the increased rate of multiple nuchal cords and true umbilical knots. Although multiple nuchal cords and true umbilical knots have been reported to be associated with fetal and/or neonatal asphyxia and/or demise [12, 13]; in this study, however long umbilical cords did not contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes by themselves. In theory, fetal movement produces a tension on the cord that creates ample free length for delivery plus the length of the wrapped cord [3]. Although an entangled cord may be at risk for intermittent or partial occlusion of umbilical blood flow as previously reported [12, 13], the excessively long cord may have self-protective effects to protect the fetuses from the risk of decreasing umbilical blood flow.

At last, in this study, the length of umbilical cords seemed to be related to placental (and infant) weight. An earlier Nigerian study of 602 cord lengths measured in labor and delivery had found a mean length of 57.5 cm, and had also found a correlation of length with infant and placental weight [13]. While, another early British study of 177 infants measured a mean cord length of 61 cm, the length did not correlate with infant or placental weight [14]. We cannot explain well the association between the length of umbilical cord and in vitro fertilization that mentioned above; however the current results may support the former report [15] that the growth umbilical cord is influenced by placental and/or fetal developments.

In conclusions, the short umbilical cords seemed to contribute to the increased rate of emergent Cesarean delivery, while the long umbilical cords seemed to contribute to the increased rate of multiple nuchal cords and true knots. However, the short or long umbilical cords may not be associated with the adverse perinatal outcomes in Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at ≥ 34 weeks’ gestation.


References▴Top 
  1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Cord measurements. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. (ed) Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed, New York, McGraw Hill, 2010; 581-582.
    pubmed
  2. Benirschke K, Kaufmann P, Baergen RN. Length of the cord. Pathology of the Human Placenta, fifth edition. Springer, New York, 2006: 394-401.
  3. Pediatric & Perinatal Pathology Associates, PSC. Umbilical cord Length (http://www.pediatricperinatalpathology.com/id4.html).
  4. Krakowiak P, Smith EN, de Bruyn G, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Risk factors and outcomes associated with a short umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):119-127.
    doi
  5. Rogers MS, Ip YW, Qin Y, Rogers SM, Sahota D. Relationship between umbilical cord morphology and nuchal cord entanglement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(1):32-37.
    doi pubmed
  6. Baergen RN, Malicki D, Behling C, Benirschke K. Morbidity, mortality, and placental pathology in excessively long umbilical cords: retrospective study. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2001;4(2):144-153.
    doi pubmed
  7. Berg TG, Rayburn WF. Umbilical cord length and acid-base balance at delivery. J Reprod Med. 1995;40(1):9-12.
    pubmed
  8. Dippel AL. Maligned Umbilical Cord Entanglements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;88:1012-1019.
  9. Sinnathuray TA. Cord round the neck. An evaluation of its significance. Singapore Med J. 1965;6(4):213-218.
    pubmed
  10. Englert Y, Imbert MC, Van Rosendael E, Belaisch J, Segal L, Feichtinger W, Wilkin P, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod. 1987;2(2):155-157.
    pubmed
  11. Jauniaux E, Englert Y, Vanesse M, Hiden M, Wilkin P. Pathologic features of placentas from singleton pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76(1):61-64.
    pubmed
  12. Larson JD, Rayburn WF, Crosby S, Thurnau GR. Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(4):1228-1231.
    doi
  13. Airas U, Heinonen S. Clinical significance of true umbilical knots: a population-based analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19(3):127-132.
    doi pubmed
  14. Agboola A. Correlates of human umbilical cord length. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1978;16(3):238-239.
    pubmed
  15. Malpas P. Length of the Human Umbilical Cord at Term. Br Med J. 1964;1(5384):673-674.
    doi pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Clinical Gynecology & Obstetrics, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1271 (print), 1927-128X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal, the authors retain the copyright, the journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jcgo.org   editorial contact: editor@jcgo.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.