Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 2, June 2018, pages 37-42


Incidence and Risk Factors of Uterine Scar Dehiscence Identified at Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Case-Control Study

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart of patients’ selection. CD: cesarean delivery; ERCD: elective repeat cesarean delivery; NVD: normal vaginal delivery; TOLAC: trial of labor after cesarean; USD: uterine scar dehiscence.

Tables

Table 1. Comparison of Maternal Characteristics Between the Study Group and the Control Group
 
VariableUSD (N = 27)Control (N = 561)P value
CD: cesarean delivery; DM: diabetes mellitus; HDP: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; USD: uterine scar dehiscence. Continuous variables expressed as means ± standard deviation, while categorical variables expressed as numbers (percentage).
Maternal demographics
  Mean maternal age (years)28.4 ± 5.429 ± 5.50.6
  Mean parity2 ± 0.82.2 ± 1.50.52
  Smoking10 (37%)190 (34%)0.74
Obstetrical history
  Co-morbidity
    DM or HDP3 (11.1%)48 (8.6%)0.65
    Bateman index > 2 [8]1 (3.7%)59 (10.5%)0.25
  Previous preterm birth4 (14.8%)49 (8.9%)0.3
Current pregnancy
  Gestational age (weeks)36.7 ± 1.837.6 ± 1.80.02
  Preterm delivery < 37 weeks9 (33.3%)85 (15.2%)0.012
  Tertiary CD or higher17 (63%)219 (39%)0.013
  Inter-delivery interval ≤ 24 months18 (66.7%)251 (45.1%)0.028
  Twin gestation1 (3.7%)15 (2.7%)0.75
  Labor0.29
    Yes14 (52%)233 (41.6%)
    No13 (48%)327 (58.4)
  Hospital stay (days)3.26 ± 3.62.5 ± 10.29

 

Table 2. Comparison of the Pain at the Cesarean Scar and Mode of Previous Hysterotomy Closure Between the Study Group and the Control Group
 
VariableUSD (N = 6)Control (N = 202)P value
USD: uterine scar dehiscence. Categorical variables expressed as numbers (percentage). Data were collected from Makassed General Hospital.
Pain at the cesarean scar1 (16.7%)20 (9.9%)0.59
Previous hysterotomy closure0.22
  Single layer2 (33.3%)17/116 (14.7%)
  Double layer4 (66.7%)99/116 (85.3%)

 

Table 3. Risk Factors for Uterine Scar Dehiscence
 
Risk factorOR95% CIP value
Preterm delivery < 37 weeks2.761.183 - 6.420.019
≥ tertiary cesarean2.561.142 - 5.7350.023
Inter-delivery interval ≤ 24 months2.381.042 - 5.4360.04

 

Table 4. Comparison of Neonatal Outcomes Between the Study Group and the Control Group
 
VariableUSD (N = 27)Control (N = 561)P value
NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; USD: uterine scar dehiscence. Continuous variables expressed as means ± standard deviation and categorical variables expressed as numbers (percentage).
APGAR < 7 at 5 min1 (3.7%)10 (1.8%)0.47
Asphyxia Neonatorum1 (3.7%)9 (1.6%)0.41
Admission to NICU8 (29.6%)74 (13.2%)0.016
Birth weight (g)2,812 ± 5053,040 ± 5040.022