Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 3, Number 2, May 2014, pages 62-67

The Comparison of Ovarian Reserve After Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysterectomy for Uterine Fibroma

Tables

Table 1. Patient Characteristics at Baseline
 
Hysterectomy (n = 33) MeanEmbolization (n = 33) MeanP value
Age (y)36.21 ± 1.51635.45 ± 4.0090.485
Parity (n)3.32 ± 0.8223.10 ± 1.1030.382
Hb (mg/dL)10.64 ± 1.21210.32 ± 1.5860.359
FSH( IU/L)4.42 ± 2.2934.12 ± 2.8610.641
Follicle size (mm)18.48 ± 0.87018.97 ± 1.4250.395

 

Table 2. Post Procedural Outcomes (6 Months After Procedure)
 
Hysterectomy (n = 33) MeanEmbolization (n = 33) MeanP value
Hb (mg/dL)11.22 ± 1.050913.72 ± 1.0000.001
FSH (IU/L)4.690 ± 2.4034.321 ± 1.5860.356
Follicle size (mm)17.15 ± 0.36417.22 ± 1.0740.390

 

Table 3. Procedure Complications
 
Hysterectomy (n = 33) MeanEmbolization (n = 33) MeanP value
Pain after intervention (day)6.21 ± 1.1114.00 ± 1.000.001
Hospital stay duration (day)3.090 ± 2.3591 ± 0.5230.001
Cost ($) Insurance1201,4600.001
Return to work (day) after intervention27.181 ± 4.7388.06 ± 2.4810.001
Reintervention12 (6.06%)0.492
Flashing5 (15.15%)2 (6.06%)0.007
Bleeding days032 (94%)0.001
Bleeding reduction33 (100%)32 (94%)0.721
Pelvic pressure reduction31 (93.93%)28 (85%)0.830