Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, ISSN 1927-1271 print, 1927-128X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Gynecol Obstet and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jcgo.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 1, March 2022, pages 9-13


Is the Admission Cardiotocography Test Predictive of an Emergent Cesarean Delivery During Labor in Prolonged Pregnancies?

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Study flow chart.

Tables

Table 1. Characteristics of the Cohort: Comparison Between “Normal” and “Indeterminate” FHR During the Admission Cardiotocography Test in Prolonged Pregnancies
 
Entire cohort (N = 335)Normal FHR (category 1)a (N = 260)Indeterminate FHR (category 2)a (N = 75)P-valueb
aAccording to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology classification. bComparison between “normal” and “indeterminate” FHR during admission cardiotocography test. FHR: fetal heart rate.
Maternal age (years)30 (16 - 46)30 (16 - 46)29 (20 - 45)0.14
Body mass index (kg/cm2)28 (18 - 46)28 (18 - 46)28 (19 - 44)1
Parity1 (0 - 6)1 (0 - 6)0 (0 - 4)0.31
History of scarred uterus (%)33 (9.9)24 (9.2)9 (12)0.48
Gestational age at delivery (weeks)41.2 (41.0 - 41.9)41.2 (41.0 - 41.9)41.2 (41.0 - 41.7)0.18
Labor induction (%)157 (46.9)120 (46.2)37 (49.3)0.63
Spontaneous rupture of the membranes before onset of labor (%)58 (17.3)43 (16.5)15 (20)0.48
Oligoamnios (%)10 (3.0)6 (2.3)4 (5.3)0.17
Baby weight (g)3,510 (2,060 - 4,640)3,510 (2,060 - 4,640)3,500 (2,500 - 4,300)0.44

 

Table 2. Perinatal Outcomes: Comparison Between “Normal” and “Indeterminate” FHR During the Admission Cardiotocography Test in Prolonged Pregnancies
 
Entire cohort (N = 335)Normal FHR (category 1)a (N = 260)Indeterminate FHR (category 2)a (N = 75)P-valueb
aAccording to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology classification. bComparison between “normal category 1” and “indeterminate category 2” FHR during the admission cardiotocography test. FHR: fetal heart rate.
Cesarean delivery (%)65 (19.4)38 (14.6)27 (36)< 0.01
Cesarean delivery for fetal distress (%)46/65 (76.7)22/38 (57.9)24/27 (88.9)0.02
Operative vaginal delivery (%)74 (22.1)55 (21.1)19 (25.3)0.44
Neonatal pH7.23 (6.99 - 7.42)7.23 (7.02 - 7.42)7.23 (6.99 - 7.41)0.95
Neonatal lactates (mmol/L)4.5 (1.5 - 12)4.25 (1.5 - 12)4.25 (2.0 - 9.0)0.82
Apgar score (5 minutes)10 (1 - 10)10 (4 - 10)10 (1 - 10)0.21
Apgar score (5 min) < 7 (%)4 (1.2)2 (0.7)2 (2.7)0.17
Hospitalization in neonatal intensive care unit (%)3 (0.9)2 (0.8)1 (1.3)0.53

 

Table 3. Predictors for Emergency Cesarean During Labor in Case With the Observation of a Category 2 Fetal Heat Pattern During the Admission Test in Prologned Pregnancy
 
Odds ratio95% confidence intervalP-value
aAccording to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology classification. FHR: fetal heart rate.
Parity0.460.3 - 0.7< 0.01
Gestational age at delivery2.350.6 - 8.80.20
Labor induction1.680.9 - 3.10.09
Scarred uterus9.083.6 - 23.2< 0.01
Category 2 FHR patterna3.471.8 - 6.5< 0.01