Minimal Stimulation Using Letrozole in Poor Responders

Ker Yi Wong, Tat Xin Ee, Heng Hao Tan

Abstract


Background: Poor responders refer to women who undergo ovarian stimulation with suboptimal response and an optimal treatment for them has yet to be proven. Minimal stimulation which uses lower doses of gonadotropins than standard long protocols had been shown to yield fewer but higher quality embryos. Minimal stimulation had thus been proposed as an option for poor responders who do not benefit from longer and higher cost regimens. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate outcomes of poor responders who underwent minimal stimulation using letrozole and whether they are comparable to outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) in a tertiary center in Singapore.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 43 poor responders who underwent minimal stimulation protocol in KK WomenWomens and ChildrenWomens Hospital IVF center between March 2011 and March 2014. The protocol involved sequential administration of letrozole followed by low-dose gonadotropins and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per patient. A subgroup analysis was done for women undergoing minimal stimulation protocol and having failed conventional IVF protocol in which their outcomes were compared.

Results: The average age at time of stimulation was 38.6 years old. Clinical pregnancies were achieved in nine women (20.9%), out of which eight (18.6%) were live births. In the subgroup analysis, cleavage rate obtained in the minimal stimulation protocol was significantly higher at 61.3% compared to the cleavage rate obtained in the conventional IVF cycle at 28.7%. There were no significant differences in the pregnancy and live birth rates of the two cycles.

Conclusion: Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole produces a reasonable live birth rate in poor responders and potentially higher quality oocytes than conventional IVF protocol.




J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(3):77-80
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo557


Keywords


Poor responder; Clomiphene citrate; In vitro fertilization; Letrozole; Minimal ovarian stimulation

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Clinical Gynecology & Obstetrics, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1271 (print), 1927-128X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal, the authors retain the copyright, the journal is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jcgo.org   editorial contact: editor@jcgo.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.